[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-kernel
Subject: Re: New nanosecond stat patch for 2.5.44
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa () zytor ! com>
Date: 2002-10-31 0:34:42
[Download RAW message or body]
Followup to: <20021030221724.GA25231@bjl1.asuk.net>
By author: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> That's some of the overhead. The other overhead is reading the clock,
> which is quite high on x86 when TSC is not available. On a Pentium
> with no reliable TSC, I think that the time for a read() system call
> is comparable to the time to read the clock.
>
Typically the way you deal with not having a usably cheap
nanosecond-resolution clock is that you use the best available clock
(say if HZ=1000 you'll increment by 1000000 each timer tick), and then
simply use an atomic counter for the smaller divisions. This makes
the relation "is A newer than B" correct, while avoiding the overhead
of producing exact timestamps below the available resolution.
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic