On Sunday 27 October 2002 22:34, Hank Leininger wrote: > On 2002-10-27, Rob Landley wrote: > > Marc.theaimsgroup.com has a lovely "raw mode", but it truncates posts > > that are too long. > > This is true, and I consider it a bug. However the limit should be qui= te > high--either 256KB or 1MB or so. So raising / eliminating the limit is= n't > high on my priority list :-P Please do let us know (me directly, or > webguy@theaimsgroup.com) if you find other mails that have been truncat= ed > at shorter than this, I'll look into it. > > Also, I'm interested in any corner cases where the attachment-parser me= sses > up--most of all when it fails to make attachments properly downloadable= , > but also, to a lesser extent, any predictably readable mime-type, encod= ing, > etc which it currently doesn't try to print in-line, but could. This one went totally bonkers, but the post it was embedded in could have= been=20 too long: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D103559201620433&q=3Dp3 > > Erich: Could you put your october 25 numa scheduler posting on your > > home page somewhere? I tried: > > > > http://home.arcor.de/efocht/patches/01-numa_sched_core-2.5.44-10a.pat= ch > > If I've got the right mail, you're after this one, correct? > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D103556765829589&w=3D= 2 > > ...Which looks complete from here? That particular patch can be downlo= aded > directly as: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D103556765829589&q=3D= p3 I've since audited the patches (downloading via q=3Draw) to make sure the= =20 linux-kernel mailing list blurb was at the end of them. The penultimate = list=20 will be posted in a few minutes, just trying to catch up on linux-kernel=20 first to see if I missed anything. Rob --=20 http://penguicon.sf.net - Terry Pratchett, Eric Raymond, Pete Abrams, Ill= iad,=20 CmdrTaco, liquid nitrogen ice cream, and caffienated jello. Well why not= ?