[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-kernel
Subject:    Re: Crunch time -- the musical.  (2.5 merge candidate list 1.5)
From:       "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh () aracnet ! com>
Date:       2002-10-26 18:58:02
[Download RAW message or body]

>> I still haven't been able to get your scheduler to boot for about
>> the last month without crashing the system. Andrew says he has it
>> booting somehow on 2.5.44-mm4, so I'll steal his kernel tommorow and
>> see how it looks. If the numbers look good for doing boring things
>> like kernel compile, SDET, etc, I'm happy.
> 
> I thought this problem is well understood! For some reasons independent of
> my patch you have to boot your machines with the "notsc" option. This
> leaves the cache_decay_ticks variable initialized to zero which my patch
> doesn't like. I'm trying to deal with this inside the patch but there is
> still a small window when the variable is zero. In my opinion this needs
> to be fixed somewhere in arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c. Booting a machine
> with cache_decay_ticks=0 is pure nonsense, as it switches off cache
> affinity which you absolutely need! So even if "notsc" is a legal option,
> it should be fixed such that it doesn't leave your machine without cache
> affinity. That would anyway give you a falsified behavior of the O(1)
> scheduler.

Oh, not sure if I ever replied to this or not. I don't *have* to boot
with notsc, I just usually do. And it crashed either way, so it's a
different problem (changing versions of gcc seems to perturb it too).
BUT ... your new patches 1 and 2 don't have this problem. See followup
email in a second.

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]