[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-integrity
Subject:    RE: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
From:       Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda () nvidia ! com>
Date:       2023-05-24 12:43:12
Message-ID: DM4PR12MB5769499349B6B936FE46BF0CC3419 () DM4PR12MB5769 ! namprd12 ! prod ! outlook ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 8:41 PM
> To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>; Mark Brown
> <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>; jsnitsel@redhat.com;
> robh+dt@kernel.org; peterhuewe@gmx.de; jgg@ziepe.ca;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org; linux-spi@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> tegra@vger.kernel.org; linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>;
> Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>; Laxman Dewangan
> <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
> Subject: RE: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> > Sent: 24 April 2023 21:02
> > To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>; Krishna Yarlagadda
> > <kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>; jsnitsel@redhat.com; robh+dt@kernel.org;
> > peterhuewe@gmx.de; jgg@ziepe.ca; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org;
> > linux-spi@vger.kernel.org; linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > integrity@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Hunter
> > <jonathanh@nvidia.com>; Sowjanya Komatineni
> > <skomatineni@nvidia.com>; Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 04:18:45PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 04:46:24PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >
> > > > Would it make sense for you to pick up patch 2/3 as well? As far as I
> > > > can tell there's a build dependency on patch 1/3 because of the newly
> > > > added SPI_TPM_HW_FLOW symbol.
> > >
> > > I'll include it in my pull request for spi this time round so it should
> > > end up in -rc1, my thinking was that I was happy with the SPI bits and
> > > if it was in -rc1 then the TPM bits could be handled without cross tree
> > > issues when the review was sorted (which it is now but wasn't at the
> > > time).  If the SPI side doesn't make -rc1 for some reason I can pick up
> > > the TPM bit as well, and/or do a signed tag.
> >
> > Sounds good.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thierry
> 
> Mark,
> Now that SPI changes are in, can we pull this TPM change for rc2.
> Will this be picked into SPI or TPM list?
Jarkko, Mark,
Can we pick this change in TPM list since SPI header changes are in.

Regards
KY
> Thanks,
> KY
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]