[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-kernel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pata_of_platform: fix no irq handling
From: Wang Jian <lark () linux ! net ! cn>
Date: 2008-10-07 9:18:38
Message-ID: 48EB296E.5050808 () linux ! net ! cn
[Download RAW message or body]
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 03:41:19PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote:
>>> There is a simple problem with the patch which is that an "IRQ 0" can and does
>>> actually exist on a bunch of platforms, at least to the best of my knowledge.
>>>
>>> Checking for -1 (which means for definite, no irq at all, because it is
>>> totally unambiguous, as a -1 IRQ numbering is "impossible") is more correct.
>> This was discussed years ago.
>>
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/22/159
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/22/227
>>
>
> Would this break any existing platforms? If so, can those be fixed
> together or does it become a much bigger problem that way?
>
Pata_of_platform stacks upon pata_platform. This patch fixes problem
concerning definition of "no irq" without touch any other place. So
far I can't see any new problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic