[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-ia64
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 36/41] drivers: tty: serial: 8250: store mmio resource size in port struct
From:       Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko () linux ! intel ! com>
Date:       2019-04-29 15:39:49
Message-ID: 20190429153949.GV9224 () smile ! fi ! intel ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 04:55:05PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> On 28.04.19 17:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 02:52:17PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:

> >> -	int ret = 0;
> > 
> > This and Co is a separate change that can be done in its own patch.
> 
> I don't really understand :(
> Do you mean the splitting off the retval part from the rest ?

You do two things here: one of them is removing ret and other relative changes.
This should be split to a separate patch.

> > You may increase readability by introducing temporary variables
> > 
> > 	... mapbase = port->mapbase;
> > 	... mapsize = port->mapsize;
> > 	...
> > 	port->membase = ioremap_nocache(mapbase, mapsize);
> > 	...
> 
> Is that really necessary ? Maybe it's just my personal taste, but I
> don't feel the more more verbose one is really easier to read.

Up to Greg. For me it's harder to read all those port-> in several parameters.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]