[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-i2c
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 00/22] Don't use kmalloc() with GFP_DMA
From:       Christoph Hellwig <hch () lst ! de>
Date:       2022-02-24 6:33:30
Message-ID: 20220224063330.GB20383 () lst ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 08:18:08PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > The long term goal is to remove ZONE_DMA entirely at least for
> > architectures that only use the small 16MB ISA-style one.  It can
> > then be replaced with for example a CMA area and fall into a movable
> > zone.  I'd have to prototype this first and see how it applies to the
> > s390 case.  It might not be worth it and maybe we should replace
> > ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32 with a ZONE_LIMITED for those use cases as
> > the amount covered tends to not be totally out of line for what we
> > built the zone infrastructure.
> 
> So probably I'm missing something; but for small systems where we
> would only have ZONE_DMA, how would a CMA area within this zone
> improve things?

It would not, but more importantly we would not need it at all.  The
thinking here is really about the nasty 16MB ISA-style zone DMA.
a 31-bit something rather different.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]