[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-i2c
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 1/4] driver core: introduce helper macro initcall_driver()
From:       Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo () linaro ! org>
Date:       2013-09-30 14:28:14
Message-ID: 52498A7E.8080606 () linaro ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 2013年09月30日 18:15, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 01:13:52PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> For some devices especially on platform/I2C/SPI bus, they want to
>> be initialized earlier than other devices, so the driver use initcall
>> such as subsys_initcall to make this device initialize earlier.
> And this is something we want to get rid of in favor of deferred
> probing.
>
>> But for those drivers, lots of them just do nothing special in
>> xxx_initcall/exit, so introduce a helper macro initcall_driver() to
>> eliminate lots of boilerplate just like module_driver() did.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
> So, NACK because using some *_initcall in drivers should not be
> encouraged.

Ok, got it. I agree with you, *_initcall in module driver is really
confusing people :)

Thanks
Hanjun
>
> Thanks,
>
>     Wolfram
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]