[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-hams
Subject:    Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] net: don't include filter.h from net/sock.h
From:       Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko () linux ! intel ! com>
Date:       2022-01-04 15:42:34
Message-ID: YdRq6vKceOqscaKK () smile ! fi ! intel ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 09:20:12AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 17:33:39 -0800 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > It would be nice if we used the number of files rebuilt because of a 
> > header file change as another metric that the kernel is evaluated with 
> > from release to release (or even on a commit by commit basis). Food for 
> > thought.
> 
> Maybe Andy has some thoughts, he has been working on dropping
> unnecessary includes of kernel.h, it seems.

With this [1] announcement I believe Ingo is the best to tell you if this is a
right direction.

> It'd be cool to plug something that'd warn us about significant
> increases in dependencies into the patchwork build bot.
> 
> I have one more small series which un-includes uapi/bpf.h from
> netdevice.h at which point I hope we'll be largely in the clear 
> from build bot performance perspective.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YdIfz+LMewetSaEB@gmail.com/T/#u

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]