[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-ha-dev
Subject: Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Postfix status
From: renayama19661014 () ybb ! ne ! jp
Date: 2011-06-16 3:48:00
Message-ID: 235088.60561.qm () web200003 ! mail ! kks ! yahoo ! co ! jp
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi Raoul,
I confirmed movement of postfix in the next environment.
* RHEL5 - postfix 2.3.3
* RHEL6 - postfix 2.6.6
The postfix ra worked well.
However, my patch made a mistake.
I do not seem to get the result of postfix status.
It is necessary to watch log of postfix in the details of the problem after all.
Therefore, I withdraw the patch of the part of postfix status.
diff -r 19c97e0021f0 postfix
--- a/postfix Thu Jun 16 21:45:53 2011 +0900
+++ b/postfix Thu Jun 16 21:46:01 2011 +0900
@@ -98,12 +98,8 @@
postfix_running() {
# run Postfix status if available
if ocf_is_true $status_support; then
- output=`$binary $OPTION_CONFIG_DIR status 2>&1`
- ret=$?
- if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then
- ocf_log err "Postfix status: '$output'." $ret
- fi
- return $ret
+ $binary $OPTION_CONFIG_DIR status 2>&1
+ return $?
fi
# manually check Postfix's pid
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Wed, 2011/6/15, renayama19661014@ybb.ne.jp <renayama19661014@ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
> Hi Raoul,
>
> I'm sorry.
> I was weak in English, and it confused you.
>
> > please refetch one last time from
> > https://github.com/raoulbhatia/resource-agents/blob/master/heartbeat/postfix
> >
> > i think i got the probing issue fixed!
>
> I confirm movement and will inform it of a result tomorrow.
>
> Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamauchi
>
> --- On Wed, 2011/6/15, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] <r.bhatia@ipax.at> wrote:
>
> > Hi Hideo-san!
> >
> > On 06/15/2011 10:53 AM, renayama19661014@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> > > Hi Raoul,
> > >
> > > Thank you for comment.
> > >
> > >> please test the postfix ra from my repository:
> > >> https://github.com/raoulbhatia/resource-agents/blob/master/heartbeat/postfix
> > >>
> > >> there is a "minor" issue regarding probes and a resulting double start,
> > >> which is left to be resolved. no other issues in my production
> > >> environment so far.
> > >>
> > >> so i'd be glad if you could give it a shot!
> > >
> > > All right.
> > >
> > > I confirm movement in postfix which you showed.
> >
> > i'm sorry but i do not understand what you mean by that.
> > can you please rephrase that?
> >
> >
> > > Because our environment is RHEL, I report a test result on RHEL5 and RHEL6.
> > perfect!
> >
> > please refetch one last time from
> > https://github.com/raoulbhatia/resource-agents/blob/master/heartbeat/postfix
> >
> > i think i got the probing issue fixed!
> >
> > thanks,
> > raoul
> > --
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc. email. r.bhatia@ipax.at
> > Technischer Leiter
> >
> > IPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OG web. http://www.ipax.at
> > Barawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11 email. office@ipax.at
> > 1190 Wien tel. +43 1 3670030
> > FN 277995t HG Wien fax. +43 1 3670030 15
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> >
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic