[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-ha-dev
Subject:    Re: [Linux-ha-dev] GPL (no version) vs GPLv2 vs GPLv2+
From:       Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb () suse ! de>
Date:       2007-12-12 12:14:00
Message-ID: 20071212121400.GD7107 () marowsky-bree ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On 2007-12-11T22:14:36, Sebastian Reitenbach <sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de> wrote:

> personally, I'd prefer the BSD or ISC license, as these are short, and more
> important, I understand them. fwiw, for the small bits I contributed, feel
> free to change it to any GPL version necessary.

I don't think a non-GPL compatible license is possible for us; we need
to be able to freely link with GPL'ed code and/or incorporate code from
GPL'ed products.

Personally I'm inclined towards GPLv2+; that seems to cover the most
bases.


Regards,
    Lars

-- 
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde

_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]