[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-ha-dev
Subject:    Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] Proposal SNMP subagent extention for CRM
From:       Andrew Beekhof <beekhof () gmail ! com>
Date:       2007-11-20 11:50:05
Message-ID: 019945FA-A6F6-44CE-9F74-7A73B1DE8B22 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


On Nov 15, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Keisuke MORI wrote:

> Andrew,
>
> Thank you for your comments.
>
> Andrew Beekhof <beekhof@gmail.com> writes:
>>> I would appreciate any comments and suggestions
>>> to make it more usable for everybody in the community.
>>
>> you might want to include so other data (such as failed, is_managed,
>> etc) in the trap
>>
>> also, it might be an idea to include a back-link for resources that
>> are in groups/clones/etc
>>
>>
>> <quote>
>>    NOTE :   This trap is sent only when the resource operation
>> succeeds.
>>           Concretely, the extended hbagent gets the cib information
>> when it
>>           changes, and parse it. And if the rc_code of the operation
>> (like
>>           CRMD_ACTION_START) is "0", then the hbagent sends a trap.
>> </quote>
>>
>> it worries me a little that you only send the trap when rc=0...
>> you don't want to know about failed actions?
>
> The intention of the trap is letting you know the current status
> of resources (such as running/stopped/etc.), and not the result
> of each operations. This is similar to LHAResourceGroupStatus
> object which is the resource status V1.
> (The note above is just for an explanation that how it's implemented.)

fair enough

> But, yeah, your point is right and it might be also useful.
> Does anybody want to use this information?
>
> We're considering to extend it more, but before we proceed
> I would like to design the new MIB definition first.
> Does anyone have comments for this?

I'm not really a user of it, but I think its a great idea if you want  
improve it.
Of course I'd also be happy to look over anything you come up with.

There was some other people on the regular (non-dev) list talking  
about SNMP recently too... maybe they would have some feedback.

>
>
> I would like to hear more, particularly about what kind of
> information is needed from whom really wants to use the SNMP agent.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Keisuke MORI
> NTT DATA Intellilink Corporation
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]