[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-ha-dev
Subject:    Re: [Linux-ha-dev] http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/rev/e9cca735b5d1
From:       Max Hofer <max.hofer () apus ! co ! at>
Date:       2007-09-03 7:13:21
Message-ID: 200709030913.22193.max.hofer () apus ! co ! at
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday 31 August 2007, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That's a fairly big patch which replace LRMBasicSanityCheck with
> parts of the LRM regression tests. It passes here on opensuse
> 10.2. Please test if you have some time to spare on other
> platforms.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Dejan
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Only of curiosity.

Do bugs like 1688 get integrated into the regression tests?

http://old.linux-foundation.org/developer_bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1688

Something like:
a) successful parameter change 
- insert new resource (which is started)
- change resource parameters (which stop/restart)
- stop resource
- check if the new parameters were used on stop

b) parameter change with failed stop
- insert new resource (which is started)
- change resource parameters (on stop fail --> goes unmanaged)
- stop resource
- check if the old parameters are used for stop operation
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]