[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-ha-dev
Subject:    Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH] Use elapsed in G_main_setall_id()
From:       Horms <horms () verge ! net ! au>
Date:       2007-05-31 7:45:40
Message-ID: 20070531074539.GB1520 () verge ! net ! au
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:23:00PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 5/30/07, Horms <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> >On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:31:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> >> [ Once again, this time to the list ! ]
> >>
> >> As pointed out to me by my colleague Matsuda-san,
> >> it seems that G_main_setall_id() really ought to
> >> pass its elapsed parameter on to G_main_setmaxdispatchtime_id().
> >>
> >> The line in question was last moified by the following changset,
> >> which creates the G_main_setall_id() setup function and
> >> seems to also create this slight problem.
> >
> >Ok, this is not my day. The changeset is 4896848a8d42
> >
> >http://hg.beekhof.net/lha/crm-dev/rev/4896848a8d42
> 
> based on the code that G_main_setall_id is replacing, your fix looks
> correct to me

Thanks, I've gone ahead and applied the change.

-- 
Horms
  H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
  W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/

_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]