[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-ha-dev
Subject:    Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: [Bug 957] It is a mistake for the CRM to rely
From:       Andrew Beekhof <beekhof () gmail ! com>
Date:       2005-12-16 11:28:38
Message-ID: 26ef5e70512160328j4330c943u7d4e944c1b1aec42 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 11/30/05, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de> wrote:
> On 2005-11-22T12:32:14, Andrew Beekhof <beekhof@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The only sane interpretation is therefore to treat the resource failed.
>
> Right. However, we need to recover from as many things as possible,
> gracefully.
>
> > Also, for the record, option A is not allowed as it would
> > bypass/conflict with the "multiple active" recovery policies
> > configured in the CIB and carried out in the PE.
>
> BTW, this is not true. "A" in particular referred to the case where,
> after a successful start, a "monitor" returned an unexpected "stopped"
> status code. Treating this as a failed resource (and thus doing a "stop"
> first) is absolutely harmless and might help catch corner cases.
>

Ok - I probably misinterpreted you there.
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]