[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-ha-dev
Subject:    RE: [Linux-ha-dev] Large delays in sending ordered HA messages
From:       "Zhu, Yi" <yi.zhu () intel ! com>
Date:       2004-05-30 8:40:22
Message-ID: 3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F842DB1EB () PDSMSX403 ! ccr ! corp ! intel ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Andrew wrote:
> 
> Ok, but if this the first ordered message between two clients
> (and both are available) then we dont wait SEQGAP do we?  At
> least we dont appear to be since ordered comms starts with no delay.

Yes.

> If the delay is at the receiver's (nodeB) end, I dont see the
> difference between when both nodeA and nodeB have never seen
> each other and when nodeA has seen nodeB but nodeB hasnt seen nodeA.
> 
> Appologies if i'm beating a dead horse here, its just that I
> dont know whether things are bugs, known glitches, or
> features.  Are there any docs I can go read to see what the
> intended purposes where and the design?

This is known glitch for your requirement. But before we have
the "join protocol", I think "delay" is better than "wrong".

Thanks,
-yi
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]