[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-ha-dev
Subject:    Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Re: [Linux-ha-cvs] E CVS: ldirectord by alan from 24.221.212.80
From:       Alan Robertson <alanr () unix ! sh>
Date:       2002-04-27 4:51:50
[Download RAW message or body]

Ragnar Kjørstad wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 09:32:55PM -0000, linux-ha-cvs-admin@lists.community.tummy.com wrote:
> 
>>But to work properly with heartbeat, shouldn't ldirectord avoid the word "running"
>>since this is one of the words heartbeat looks for to indicate the resource is active.
>>
>>Changing ldirectord to say "stopped" instead of "not running" fixes the problem. 
>>
> 
> What caused the problem? Heartbeat checking if the service was running
> at bootup?
> 
> If so, shouldn't heartbeat check the exit-code rather than the output?


That would be a good idea if all my customers ran versions of Linux which do 
this correctly ;-)

Until a recent LSB edition, there was no standard.  On Red Hat, they used to 
return 0 if they could correctly determine status (regardless of what the 
status was ;-))

	-- Alan Robertson
	   alanr@unix.sh

_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.community.tummy.com
http://lists.community.tummy.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]