[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-ha
Subject:    Re: hierachie
From:       Jerome Etienne <jetienne () arobas ! net>
Date:       2000-03-21 17:31:31
[Download RAW message or body]

ok i reread several time the doc and now, i think i understand your model.

On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 10:06:06PM +0000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> No, the concepts of different lists in my hierarchial model is there 
> only to allow shared-data services to span multiple clusters, in which
> case it is enormously important that all of the nodes involved in the
> recovery are known (so there _has_ to be a list of peers).  If you
> don't have such services, the peer list is empty and my model doesn't 
> track the membership of sub-clusters at all.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Linux HA Web Site:
  http://linux-ha.org/
Linux HA HOWTO:
  http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/ALPHA/linux-ha/High-Availability-HOWTO.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]