[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-ha
Subject:    Re: [Linux-HA] hb 2.0.3 cvs does not start anymore with config of
From:       Alan Robertson <alanr () unix ! sh>
Date:       2005-11-30 11:35:11
Message-ID: 438D8E6F.6030309 () unix ! sh
[Download RAW message or body]

Joachim Banzhaf wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 24. November 2005 14:30 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
> 
>>> Isn't it so, that we know all possibly participating nodes from ccm and
>>> can proceed, as soon as every node of that list has voted? Waiting for
>>> timeouts should only be necessary, if a node from this list does not
>>> respond.
>> yes - that would be a potential optimization.  if you feel strongly
>> you can add it to bugzilla as an enhancement and it will get done once
>> i'm back.
> 
> done: Bug 977

I'm surprised that this so-called optimiztion is necessary.  I know I 
talked to Andrew about this nearly a year ago, and had received 
assurances that it didn't behave this way.  Guess our communication 
wasn't as clear as I thought it was at the time.


-- 
     Alan Robertson <alanr@unix.sh>

"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship...  Let me 
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William 
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]