[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-fsdevel
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 0/6] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts
From:       Paul Moore <paul () paul-moore ! com>
Date:       2018-06-29 18:01:44
Message-ID: CAHC9VhTMOKGJu0JvAUuVRYmBvSq18oguhr9ufO6NF7w=LbRLew () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:44 AM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this series addresses the problems I have identified when trying to understand
> > how exactly is kernel/audit_tree.c using generic fsnotify framework. I hope
> > I have understood all the interactions right but careful review is certainly
> > welcome (CCing Al as he was the one implementing this code originally).
> >
> > The patches have been tested by a stress test I have written which mounts &
> > unmounts filesystems in the directory tree while adding and removing audit
> > rules for this tree in parallel and accessing the tree to generate events.
> > Still some real-world testing would be welcome.
> >
>
> This sort of stress test sound really useful to fanotify/inotify as well.
> Do plan to upstream that stress test?

Agreed.

I would be interested in having something like this in the
audit-testsuite so that we can include it in our regular regression
testing.

* https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-testsuite

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]