[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-fpga
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/33] spi: get rid of some legacy macros
From: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig () pengutronix ! de>
Date: 2024-01-16 15:18:34
Message-ID: l4azekfj7hduzi4wcyphispst46fi3m5ams65nzer2ai6upoxw () 3p2uki626ytt
[Download RAW message or body]
Hello Mark,
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 02:40:39PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 09:12:46PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> > In commit 8caab75fd2c2 ("spi: Generalize SPI "master" to "controller"")
> > some functions were renamed. Further some compat defines were introduced
> > to map the old names to the new ones.
>
> > Patch #18 and #19 touch the same driver, otherwise the patches #1 - #31
> > are pairwise independent and could be applied by their respective
> > maintainers. The alternative is to let all patches go via the spi tree.
> > Mark, what's your preference here?
>
> I don't have a strong preference here, I'm happy to take all the patches
> if the maintainers for the other subsystem are OK with that - ideally
> I'd apply things at -rc1 but the timeline is a bit tight there. I think
> my plan here unless anyone objects (or I notice something myself) will
> be to queue things at -rc3, please shout if that doesn't seem
> reasonable.
From my side there is no rush, we lived with these defines since
4.13-rc1. Applying them during the next merge window is fine for me.
Anyhow, I intend to resend the series for the feedback I received after
-rc1. Up to you when you want to apply it. Watching out for offending
patches using lore shouldn't be a big thing and I can do that.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic