[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-fpga
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] firmware: stratix10-svc: extend SVC driver to get the firmware version
From:       Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen () kernel ! org>
Date:       2022-01-27 2:56:11
Message-ID: 1f6acc9f-da52-df60-e1fb-53b86419457a () kernel ! org
[Download RAW message or body]



On 1/26/22 18:39, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 08:54:48PM -0800, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>> Dinh,
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 10:31:06PM -0600, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/25/22 19:07, Xu Yilun wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 01:28:53PM -0600, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>>> From: Richard Gong <richard.gong@intel.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Extend Intel service layer driver to get the firmware version running at
>>>>> FPGA device. Therefore FPGA manager driver, one of Intel service layer
>>>>> driver's client, can decide whether to handle the newly added bitstream
>>>>> authentication function based on the retrieved firmware version.
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Moritz Fischr <mdf@kernel.org>
>>>>
>>>> This is already acked and no more change, is it? So please just ping in
>>>> the original mail or add the [RESEND PATCH] prefix.
>>>>
>>>> The patch is good to me.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, I added Moritz Acked-by: is the only change.
>>>
>>> Dinh
>>
>> Did we traditionally take those through FPGA tree, did Greg pick those
>> up?
> 
> This patch was the 3rd one of a patchset. It is acked but the patchset
> is not, so we didn't take the single one in FPGA tree. This is the last
> conversation.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/YGDsl3VlIAnyJDzd@epycbox.lan/
> 

Right, Richard has left Intel. So what I've done is gone back and try to 
re-send patches that have been Acked, like this one, and split out the 
other patches to a smaller series to restart the process.

Dinh
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]