[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-fbdev
Subject:    Re: [PATCH v0 10/14] sfc: falcon: Make I2C terminology more inclusive
From:       Easwar Hariharan <eahariha () linux ! microsoft ! com>
Date:       2024-04-04 19:17:26
Message-ID: cd983b4d-70dc-47b8-96cd-55bba39eb892 () linux ! microsoft ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 4/2/2024 1:29 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:34PM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
>> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
>> I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
>> in the specification.
>>
>> Compile tested, no functionality changes intended
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322132619.6389-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>


Thank you, Simon, for reviewing. I believe that we are settling on controller/target
terminology from feedback on the other drivers in this series. Would you want to re-review
v1 with that change, or should I add you R-B in v1 despite the change?

Thanks,
Easwar

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]