[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-edac
Subject:    RE: [PATCH] x86, signals: add missing signal_compat code for x86 features
From:       "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck () intel ! com>
Date:       2016-05-24 22:49:08
Message-ID: 3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3A0D6A23 () ORSMSX114 ! amr ! corp ! intel ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> Tony / Borislav, do we have tests for the machine check code that could
> have caught this?

If I had built one of my recovery test programs as a 32-byte binary instead of native \
64-bit I might have noticed (I only print the lsb field ... which would have been \
garbage on the stack, maybe I'd have spotted a silly value).

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-edac" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]