[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-cifs
Subject:    Re: patch status
From:       Steve French <smfrench () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-07-31 21:29:17
Message-ID: CAH2r5mt1QaDH_YVumTavDccVZCRaK_cct9VOAfe8A-nwvhH-=Q () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Have finished reviewing all of your patches that I saw in your
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jlayton/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/cifs-3.1

looking at Pavel's now.  Will probably request upstream merge of the current
eight patches first.

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:07:50 -0500
> Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Reviewed and merged
>>       cifs: advertise the right receive buffer size to the server
>>       cifs: trivial: goto out here is unnecessary
>>       cifs: don't start signing too early
>>       cifs: fix name parsing in CIFSSMBQAllEAs
>>
>> am currently looking at the oplock refcounting patch, and Pavel's
>> demultiplex simplification series, the on to the others.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Steve
>
> Thanks, If you're not going to take this patch that I sent back in
> March, then I'd appreciate an official "NAK", preferably with the
> reasoning, so I can stop carrying it in my tree:
>
>    cifs: remove unneeded variable initialization in cifs_reconnect_tcon
>
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
>



-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]