[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-btrfs
Subject:    Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Btrfs: free space tree and sanity test fixes
From:       David Sterba <dsterba () suse ! cz>
Date:       2016-09-29 14:29:45
Message-ID: 20160929142945.GC5531 () suse ! cz
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 04:02:35PM +0300, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
> > Try to add https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9332707/ aka
> > "Btrfs: improve check_node to avoid reading corrupted nodes" which should return
> > -EIO and prevent the BUG().
> 
> Guys,
> 
> I was wrong with "Btrfs: remove unnecessary btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty in
> split_leaf" , because I've used patch from email
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=147319873029152&w=2 which patches
> fs/btrfs/ctree.c , but forgot to apply kdave git kernel commit
> 1ba98d086fe3a14d6a31f2f66dbab70c45d00f63 "Btrfs: detect corruption
> when non-root leaf has zero item"
> 
> :-/
> 
> Should I remake all the tests?

It would be much appreciated, as we probably won't get any other sparc64
testing. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]