[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-btrfs
Subject:    Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] mount.btrfs helper
From:       cwillu <cwillu () cwillu ! com>
Date:       2014-11-30 23:27:24
Message-ID: CAE5mzvg_pUfj1axQ9F2ur247CG+foHBvBf+XN8qnmsz64SL=mw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Sorry, misread "initrdless" as "initramfs".

In #btrfs, I usually say something like "do you gain enough by not
using an initfs for this to be worth the hassle?", but of course,
that's not an argument against making mount smarter.

On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@debian.org> wrote:
> On 30 November 2014 at 22:31, cwillu <cwillu@cwillu.com> wrote:
>>
>> In ubuntu, the initfs runs a btrfs dev scan, which should catch
>> anything that would be missed there.
>>
>
> I'm sorry, udev rule(s) is not sufficient in the initramfs-less case,
> as outlined.
>
> In case of booting with initramfs, indeed, both Debian & Ubuntu
> include snippets there to run btrfs scan.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Dimitri.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]