[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-block
Subject:    Re: [PATCH -next v2 2/9] blk-iocost: improve hanlder of match_u64()
From:       Tejun Heo <tj () kernel ! org>
Date:       2022-11-30 20:32:19
Message-ID: Y4e90zFnhhq764lP () slm ! duckdns ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 09:21:49PM +0800, Li Nan wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> 
> 1) There are one place that return value of match_u64() is not checked.
> 2) If match_u64() failed, return value is set to -EINVAL despite that
>    there are other possible errnos.

Ditto. Does this matter?

-- 
tejun
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]