[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-backports
Subject:    Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Add CONFIG symbol as module attribute
From:       Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof () kernel ! org>
Date:       2019-06-26 22:21:08
Message-ID: CAB=NE6XEnZ1uH2nidRbn6myvdQJ+vArpTTT6iSJebUmyfdaLcQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:07 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> In lieu of no Luke Skywalker, if you will, for a large kconfig revamp
> on this, I'm inclined to believe *at least* having some kconfig_symb
> exposed for some modules is better than nothing. Christoph are you
> totally opposed to this effort until we get a non-reverse engineered
> effort in place? It just seems like an extraordinary amount of work
> and I'm not quite sure who's volunteering to do it.
>
> Other stakeholders may benefit from at least having some config -->
> module mapping for now. Not just backports or building slimmer
> kernels.

Christoph, *poke*

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic