[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-backports
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] backport: add some new kv[mz]alloc function
From:       AceLan Kao <acelan.kao () canonical ! com>
Date:       2017-07-24 2:40:20
Message-ID: CAFv23Qn9rNnEXUT9SX-hGbODt-tEqbz2M9rYZLp_AMMPpgezjA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Yes, I'm compiling the backport driver with bt enabled.
I'll keep all bt related commits until I resolved all the issue.

BTW, the new introduced functions are required by the lib/rhashtable.c

2017-07-22 19:29 GMT+08:00 Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>:
>
>
> On July 22, 2017 10:52:13 AM GMT+03:00, Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>On 21-07-17 15:21, Luca Coelho wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 14:55 +0800, AceLan Kao wrote:
>>>> add some new kv[mz]alloc functions which introduced after v4.12
>>>> by this commit
>>>>
>>>> commit a7c3e901a46ff54c016d040847eda598a9e3e653
>>>> Author: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>>>> Date:   Mon May 8 15:57:09 2017 -0700
>>>>
>>>>     mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> I don't see any backported code using any of these yet... Why do you
>>> need it?
>>
>>AceLan is trying to reinstate BT subsystem/drivers in backports so it
>>may be needed for that. If that is true I think this patch should go in
>>that "BT reinstatement" patch series.
>
>
> Yeah, but I even checked BT stuff and didn't find any occurrences...
>
> --
> Luca.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]