[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-audio-dev
Subject:    Re: [linux-audio-dev] changing control port values with LADSPA: a serious issue?
From:       Steve Harris <S.W.Harris () ecs ! soton ! ac ! uk>
Date:       2002-03-27 9:35:10
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:57:38 +0100, Tim Goetze wrote:
> >If we're going to change ladspa to add better parameter control, then
> >timestamped events seems like a better approach. How you represent this is
> >probably not important.
> 
> i see the point. however i guess that right now the issue does not
> have enough momentum to trigger a change of ladspa.h, and all that
> #includes it. it may not be important how this is implemented, but i
> think it might prove tricky if it is still to be called simple; 
> and ceterum censeo that such a system should be made able to transport 
> musical data, too. 

That would be good, but personaly I think both of these are too complex to
go in LADSPA (not anytime soon anyway).

If LADSPA evolves into something mroe complex thats OK I guess, but it
would be nice to keep something simple for newbie plugin authors to
learn on.

- Steve
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]