[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-atm
Subject:    Re: UNI 3.1 not quite right
From:       Johan Verrept <Johan.Verrept () pandora ! be>
Date:       2000-03-28 17:01:48
[Download RAW message or body]

Johan Verrept wrote:
> 
> Werner Almesberger wrote:
> >
> > Johan Verrept wrote:
> > > At work, we had some problems with 3.1 too. If i am not mistaken, it had
> > > something to do with a statemachine that was too simple on the linux
> > > side. (At least that was the conclusion of our SVC specialist, i know
> > > nothing of SVC's)
> >
> > A pointer would be welcome ... (there are many state machines, few of
> > them trivial :)
> 
> I'll ask him.
> Btw, it wasn't an alcatel switch, it was a small Virata switch, or our
> own SVC implementation, I'm not sure.

his comments were that the ilmi FSM was too simple, that is was actually
only a subset from 3.1 (only address registratin was available), and no
new ILMI 4.0 stuff
(autoconfiguratie, change of attachment point procedure, secure link,
...)

	J.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]