[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-arm-kernel
Subject: pxa/lubbock: mtd / jffs2 rootfs in 2.6.0-testx
From: "Ron Ytsma" <36214 () student ! saxion ! nl>
Date: 2003-10-29 18:47:38
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi all,
this is my first post to this list. First of all i have to thank you people
for making such good efforts. A lot of problems have been solved just by
reading!
I figure I can't get any 2.6 kernels going because of my different flash
chips. It crashes & burns on mounting the root filesystem in jffs2. It
keeps on checking CRC errors on a lot of inodes and removes child
directories. Yet in 2.4.18 it works just fine.
Hardware: Intel Xscale (PXA250) on lubbock board
(working) 2.4.18-rmk7-pxa3
in drivers/mtd/maps/lubbock.c my chip size are defined like so (different
from standard):
#define WINDOW_ADDR 0x00000000
#define WINDOW_SIZE 128*1024*1024 // 32*1024*1024
#define BUSWIDTH 4
.....
static struct mtd_partition lubbock_partitions[] = {
{
name: "Bootloader",
size: 0x00040000,
offset: 0,
mask_flags: MTD_WRITEABLE /* force read-only */
},{ name: "Kernel",
size: 0x00100000,
offset: 0x00040000,
},{ name: "Filesystem",
size: 0x03e00000, //MTDPART_SIZ_FULL,
offset: 0x00140000 // makes 0x04000000
}
....
(non-working) 2.6.0-test2/8/9
in drivers/mtd/maps/lubbock-flash.c
#define ROM_ADDR 0x00000000
#define FLASH_ADDR 0x04000000
#define WINDOW_SIZE 64*1024*1024
static struct map_info lubbock_maps[2] = { {
.size = WINDOW_SIZE,
.phys = 0x00000000,
}, {
.size = WINDOW_SIZE,
.phys = 0x04000000,
} };
......
Seems like MTD has been reworked a bit.
Questions/assumptions
-The 2.6 kernel identifies the chips as 32 bit (buswidth=4) which is
correct
-I take it WINDOW_ADDR = FLASH_ADDR
-window_size defines the size of 1 flash chip? (wich is 0x04000000)
(as the struct map_info has 2 times window_size)
-what's the ROM_ADDR?
-How do i "translate" the working 2.4.18-rmk7-pxa3 into the 2.6 kernel?(i
tried most of the logical stuff, but I'll take any suggestion :)
Any comments to the questions ? Did i make any false assumptions, or am I
looking in the wrong direction?... need help here :)
greets Ron
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic