[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-alpha
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] (Was: [regression] boot failure on alpha, bisected)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg () redhat ! com>
Date: 2012-10-14 18:42:18
Message-ID: 20121014184218.GA17416 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On 10/14, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Again, this is fine. But why "else" ? It seems that
>
> if (thread_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING) {
> do_signal(regs, r0, r19);
> r0 = 0;
> }
>
> if (thread_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) {
> clear_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
> tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
> }
>
> makes a bit more sense?
Except I meant "if (_TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)" first.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic