[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-alpha
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 0/1] (Was: [regression] boot failure on alpha, bisected)
From:       Oleg Nesterov <oleg () redhat ! com>
Date:       2012-10-14 18:42:18
Message-ID: 20121014184218.GA17416 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 10/14, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Again, this is fine. But why "else" ? It seems that
>
> 			if (thread_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING) {
> 				do_signal(regs, r0, r19);
> 				r0 = 0;
> 			}
>
> 			if (thread_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) {
> 				clear_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
> 				tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
> 			}
>
> makes a bit more sense?

Except I meant "if (_TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)" first.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic