[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: linux-alpha
Subject: Re: [regression] boot failure on alpha, bisected
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg () redhat ! com>
Date: 2012-10-08 19:10:05
Message-ID: 20121008191004.GA10306 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On 10/08, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Just wondering. As this is on an SMP system, perhaps the
> read_barrier_depends() vs. smp_read_barrier_depends() matters
> here?
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1209.3/00555.html
Yes, thanks, I do remember about this ;)
This will come as 2/2 which also removes the unnecessary "work = NULL"
initialization.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic