[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linux-aio
Subject:    Re: [patch] man-pages: add documentation about the memlock  implications of io_setup
From:       Jeff Moyer <jmoyer () redhat ! com>
Date:       2009-03-09 20:44:01
Message-ID: x494oy2ctpq.fsf () segfault ! boston ! devel ! redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Michael Kerrisk <michael.kerrisk@googlemail.com> writes:

> [RESEND: Really CC+=Vegard Nossum, this time, and += mtk.manpages@, as well]
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Note that my address for man-pages is mtk.manpages@gmail.com.

Sorry about that!

> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch, against man-pages-3.19, adds verbiage surrounding the newly
>> proposed accounting of pinned aio completion ring pages against the
>> memlock rlimit.  It also fixes up a few references to aio_context_t
>> (which should be io_context_t).  Sorry for conflating the two, I can
>> break it apart if needed.
>
> Breaking apart really would be better.  Could you resubmit (to
> mtk.manpages@, and CC linux-man@vger) please?

Sure thing.  I'll address your question when I resubmit.

Thanks!

Jeff

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-aio' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux AIO,
see: http://www.kvack.org/aio/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]