[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linaro-sched-sig
Subject:    [PATCH 08/41] nohz: Try not to give the timekeeping duty to an adaptive tickless cpu
From:       fweisbec () gmail ! com (Frederic Weisbecker)
Date:       2012-05-08 17:35:45
Message-ID: CAFTL4hzM0socf0BphDmD7qv8W8wyJnBNkuXV9tv+yo=AJUYMRg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

2012/5/7 Christoph Lameter <cl at linux.com>:
> On Tue, 1 May 2012, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
>> Try to give the timekeeing duty to a CPU that doesn't belong
>> to any nohz cpuset when possible, so that we increase the chance
>> for these nohz cpusets to run their CPUs out of periodic tick
>> mode.
>>
>> [TODO: We need to find a way to ensure there is always one non-nohz
>> running CPU maintaining the timekeeping duty if every non-idle CPUs are
>> adaptive tickless]
>
> I sure wish this would also be pinnable to a specific cpu.

Yeah, well we need to be more flexible and allow for finegrained sets of CPUs,
I quoted some reasons in one of our previous discussions:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/29/559


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]