[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       linaro-kernel
Subject:    Re: [PATCH 00/16] timers/hrtimers: Minor cleanups: Part II
From:       Thomas Gleixner <tglx () linutronix ! de>
Date:       2014-03-31 15:51:51
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.02.1403311749500.14882 () ionos ! tec ! linutronix ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 31 March 2014 19:08, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > And those cleanups make the compiler generate worse code at least on
> > x86_64:
> >
> >    text      data      bss      dec     hex    filename
> >    7475      554       0        8029    1f5d   kernel/hrtimer.o
> >    7706      554       0        8260    2044   kernel/hrtimer.o
> >
> > So just removing parameters and return values because you can get the
> > same information from a datastructure is not necessarily a good thing.
> 
> Hmm.. Nice.
> 
> Okay, I will have another look at patches and do this kind of investigation
> before sending it next time :) Its been fun going through these frameworks.
> 
> How do you want to proceed now? I mean, you will take the other patches
> (which don't play with function parameters) as is or want me to send a single
> unified patchset with all the pending patches that I have?

I still want to go through the lot and review them, but I wont take
anything before the end of the merge window.

Thanks,

	tglx

_______________________________________________
linaro-kernel mailing list
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-kernel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]