[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lilypond-user
Subject:    Re: Future of OpenLilyLib
From:       Graham King <lilypond () tremagi ! org ! uk>
Date:       2022-11-23 23:58:31
Message-ID: 149A763D-569D-428F-8E99-4DB5E7BA41EE () tremagi ! org ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks Jean and Federico.  I'll open a new thread on lyLuaTex, to avoid hijacking \
this one.

-- Graham

> On 23 Nov 2022, at 16:59, Federico Bruni <fede@inventati.org> wrote:
> 
> In order to run lyluatex with recent versions of lilypond (2.23.x), you must \
> install the most recent version of lyluatex. In other words, you should install \
> Texlive standalone and not the texlive packaged by distros. 
> See this discussion:
> https://github.com/jperon/lyluatex/issues/287
> 
> 
> Il giorno mer 23 nov 2022 alle 17:55:34 +0100, Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> \
> ha scritto:
> > Le 23/11/2022 à 16:31, Graham King a écrit :
> > > I've tried to get Scholarly working in the past, but failed.  I'm currently \
> > > failing to get lyluatex working. There are some really promising tools in \
> > > OpenLilyLib, but they seem to require someone with Urs' level of focus and \
> > > intellect to use them.  This thread is raising my hopes once more.
> > I'd suggest you open a new thread about lyLuaTeX, with details
> > of your problems getting it to run.
> > (Note that lyLuaTeX isn't part of openLilyLib.)
> > Best,
> > Jean
> 
> 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]