[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Question about GPL license
From: mason () masonhock ! com
Date: 2019-12-28 22:13:42
Message-ID: 20191228221342.l6gm4fqzajfnphna () masonhock ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On 12/28, Paolo Prete wrote:
> In these days, I worked at my Javascript script which allows to place
> Lilypond's grobs with the mouse. I think I'm ready to share a test
> version on Github. From what I see, the only license that I can use
> for it is GPLv3.
In order to make your code compatible with Lilypond (and potentially
Frescobaldi), then it should be under GPLv3 or another
GPLv3-compatible[1] license. If you choose another GPLv3 compatible
license, then your code can be distributed alone under the terms of your
chosen license, or alongside Lilypond and/or Frescobaldi under the terms
of the GPLv3.
> I just saw this article about the bad sides of this license:
>=20
> https://fodina.de/en/2019/lilypond-snippets-and-the-gpl/
This is unfounded FUD. You can ignore it, or search the archives for
prior discussion of it.
Mason
[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic