[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lilypond-user
Subject:    Re: coding question about include-d tweak/function files
From:       Urs Liska <lists () openlilylib ! org>
Date:       2018-01-30 21:27:13
Message-ID: ae022bd7-a7f7-5d85-11d1-3cb33bdc5f8b () openlilylib ! org
[Download RAW message or body]



Am 30.01.2018 um 22:14 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> On 30.01.2018 17:22, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Thinking about it, that would be a path to writing an \includeOnce or 
>> \require command in oll-core.
>> The downside with that idea is that coding tools (i.e. Frescobaldi) 
>> will be able to help much less than with regular includes: no 
>> auto-completion, neither for the include itself nor for variables 
>> defined in the included files. Also you can'T open the included file 
>> with ctrl-click.
>
> Wouldn't it be possible to have a list in Frescobaldi of ‘include 
> alias functions', which for the purpose of you mention are treated 
> just like \include? The way I think of it, a \includeOnce or \require 
> function like you propose should have the same strings be eligible 
> arguments, and also one could be certain that after \require "foo.ly" 
> the contents of foo.ly would always be ‘known' to the parser, i.e. 
> auto-complete could be used?

Sure, but as of now Frescobaldi will not support such non-standard tools 
that are not part of LilyPond itself.
Well, ignoring that fact I once started working on openLilyLib 
integration for Frescobaldi (where such functionality could be 
implemented), but for some reason or other I didn't get too far with that.

Urs

>
> Best, Simon


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]