[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lilypond-user
Subject:    Re: order of events given to engravers
From:       David Kastrup <dak () gnu ! org>
Date:       2017-10-29 20:14:13
Message-ID: 8760axg19m.fsf () fencepost ! gnu ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Maurits Lamers <maurits@weidestraat.nl> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> I came across something peculiar in the order in which events are sent
> out to the engravers.
> Assuming I have listeners on notes, rests and breaks, it turns out
> that a break event in special cases can be sent after other events on
> the same moment.
> So, my question is: when a break happens at the same moment at which
> other events takes place, can I assume the break should always be
> handled first?

No.  Listeners should just collect the events they are interested in,
and the actual processing should happen in process-music.  The order in
which listeners see events at the same time step is not defined.

-- 
David Kastrup

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]