[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lilypond-user
Subject:    Re: Augmentation dots reg test
From:       Werner LEMBERG <wl () gnu ! org>
Date:       2016-10-29 20:07:53
Message-ID: 20161029.220753.1110709788043873623.wl () gnu ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


>>What happens with your new code with overlapping, rather than
>>stacked notes? E.g. << <f a b c>4. // <a e,>2. >> (untested).
>>
>>I think from previous test cases it may become difficult to
>>understand which dots behind to which notes. IIRC there's an
>>outstanding bug about horizontal positioning in this situation.
> 
> Here is the output of your test case.  How would you like this to
> appear?

Easy to answer: There should be a larger horizontal gap between the
two chords, and the dots for the lower-voice chord should be put into
this space.

Maybe this could even be done automatically if the distance between
the notehead and its dot exceeds a certain limit.


    Werner

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]