[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lilypond-user
Subject:    Alternative fonts glyph support
From:       tisimst <tisimst.lilypond () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-12-31 22:26:59
Message-ID: 1420064819754-169988.post () n5 ! nabble ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

All,

I've been thinking about what has been done on the alternative music fonts
and I thought I'd pose a question, welcoming any feedback. Here we go...

With the workflow I use to create the font files, if there's a glyph that I
don't replace, I just keep it the way it is found in Emmentaler (e.g.,  the
shape-notes and chant notation, etc.). 

My question is this: Is this necessary to keep including them?

The truth is, there are a bunch of glyphs that I NEVER EVER change from one
font file to the next. Since we have access to all of these less-common
glyphs as a part of Emmentaler, I don't see a big need to keep propagating
them.

That being said, if no one complains too loudly, I think I may remove
support for them. What think ye all?

Happy New Years!

-Abraham





--
View this message in context: \
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Alternative-fonts-glyph-support-tp169988.html \
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]