[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lilypond-user
Subject:    Re: would 'gn' for G-natural be useful in \language "english" ?
From:       "Phil Holmes" <mail () philholmes ! net>
Date:       2014-08-29 9:02:58
Message-ID: 54928D02711A4F0BA17CC16C25B80091 () Advent
[Download RAW message or body]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Keith OHara" <k-ohara5a5a@oco.net>
To: <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 7:41 AM
Subject: would 'gn' for G-natural be useful in \language "english" ?


> Dear user list,
>   The suggestion quoted below from the bug-lilypond list
> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2014-08/msg00037.html>
> makes sense to me, as an addition to the \language "english"  note-names.
>
> It would not fit in German-style pitch-names, where 'cis' and 'ces' get 
> completely distinct names from 'c'.
> I am not sure if something similar makes sense in fixed-do naming as used 
> in French and Spanish.
>
> Would anyone else like to see 'fn' as a second way to express F-natural in 
> English (in addition to the existing 'f') ?


My vote: no.  I don't see the point of adding an alias.

--
Phil Holmes 


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]