[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lilypond-devel
Subject:    Re: Doc: avoid implicit \relative; issue 4371 (issue 237340043 by k-ohara5a5a@oco.net)
From:       k-ohara5a5a () oco ! net
Date:       2015-06-22 4:40:20
Message-ID: 001a11c30c840a49d0051913df15 () google ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I started this with the belief that relative octave notation is easier
to write (for some people) but absolute octave notation is easier to
read, and thus the expectation that many examples would be simpler using
absolute pitches, or the new \fixed c'' {}.
However, there were not so many examples where a fixed octave reference
would really help.



https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely
 File Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely#newcode912
 Documentation/learning/common-notation.itely:912: >>
One of only two examples in Learning where a single \relative was bad
advice.

https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely
 File Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely#newcode625
 Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely:625: the passing note and a
slur:
This pair of examples changes the entry order of the pitches, so would
be easier to read with  \fixed c'

https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely#newcode646
 Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely:646: }
The example is a case where a single \relative applied to parallel
voices might be practical.
It would line up better with its re-arrangement below if we use \fixed
c'

https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/diff/110001/Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely#newcode668
 Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely:668: >>
The other example in Learning where the single outer \relative was
really bad advice.

https://codereview.appspot.com/237340043/

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]