[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: lilypond-devel
Subject: Re: Revised autobeam settings patch (issue1682049)
From: n.puttock () gmail ! com
Date: 2010-07-29 20:49:02
Message-ID: 001636458c8a49a57f048c8cddd8 () google ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On 2010/07/13 15:02:56, Carl wrote:
> On 2010/07/11 23:31:50, Neil Puttock wrote:
> > beam-type ?
> I think not, because we're not talking about an argument to a function
call or
> an entry in an alist here. We're talking about something that comes
from the
> music. But I could be convinced otherwise.
I don't mind which, I was more concerned by the inconsistency: on the
next line, it says beam-type (and you use beam-type in the @itemize
block above, *before* you've presented the example for beaming rules
which uses beam-type1, beam-type2 etc.)
http://codereview.appspot.com/1682049/show
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic