[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lilypond-devel
Subject:    Re: lilypond/input/test add-staccato.ly ancient-tim...
From:       Mats Bengtsson <mats.bengtsson () s3 ! kth ! se>
Date:       2003-05-27 17:16:35
Message-ID: 3ED39D73.7010707 () s3 ! kth ! se
[Download RAW message or body]

I see a clear need for both! Mostly you want a consequent choice
of note heads, clefs, rests and so on, so you want a full example
of each style. On the other hand, as you say, it's interesting to
be able to compare different clef layouts, for example.

    /Mats

Laura Conrad wrote:
>>>>>>"Juergen" == Juergen Reuter <reuter@ipd.uka.de> writes:
>>>>>
> 
>     Juergen> However, I am not sure if it would not be better to do
>     Juergen> the separation according to notation styles (mensural,
>     Juergen> neo_mensural, vaticana, medicaea, hufnagel, ...) rather
>     Juergen> than according to notation features (time signatures,
>     Juergen> note heads, rests, accidentals, clefs, custodes, ...).
> 
> I think having some good examples somewhere of the different styles
> would be a good idea, but the input/test files should continue to have
> examples of the notation features.  Someone who's transcribing a
> particular work doesn't always know the names of the styles (who was
> Hufnagel, anyway?), and needs to look at all the C clefs or all the
> time signatures to see which one is appropriate.
> 
> 


-- 
=============================================
	Mats Bengtsson
	Signal Processing
	Signals, Sensors and Systems
	Royal Institute of Technology
	SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
	Sweden
	Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463				
         Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
	Email: mats.bengtsson@s3.kth.se
	WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================




[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]