[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lilypond-bug
Subject:    Re: ghostscript error in version 2.19.53
From:       Federico Bruni <fede () inventati ! org>
Date:       2017-01-03 9:35:20
Message-ID: 1483436120.2140.0 () smtp ! autistici ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Il giorno mar 3 gen 2017 alle 1:04, Graham Percival 
<graham@percival-music.ca> ha scritto:
> It looks like this was noticed a year ago but there was no
> resolution:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2015-12/msg00014.html
> 
> Does
>     locate Fontmap.local
> produce anything?

$ locate Fontmap.local
/etc/ghostscript/9.20/Fontmap.local

it's an empty file.. it shouldn't be?

$ find ~ -name Fontmap*
/home/fede/.local/lilypond/usr/share/ghostscript/9.20/Resource/Init/Fontmap
/home/fede/.local/lilypond/usr/share/ghostscript/9.20/Resource/Init/Fontmap.GS


> 
> Have you tried deleting your lilypond font cache and re-running?
> The first time I ran 2.19.53, I thought that it had crashed, so I
> made sure I didn't have any user font-related files and tried
> again.

Ok, I did:

$ rm -rf ~/.lilypond-fonts.cache-2/

but I still get the same error.

I used to have installed the lilypond fedora package (same version 
2.19.53). Perhaps a conflict with some system package? Centos, the 
linux distro of the above report, is based on Red Hat..
I disinstalled the fedora package because I wanted to have version 2.19 
in a path with higher priority than version 2.18.2 (installed in 
/usr/local). I'll move 2.18.2 in ~/.local and put it down in the PATH.




_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]