[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       lilypond-bug
Subject:    =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Slurs_and_ties_=E2=80=94_most_difficult_to_make=3A_devel?= =?UTF-8?Q?oper_has_to_thi
From:       Thomas Morley <thomasmorley65 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2016-12-20 23:45:27
Message-ID: CABsfGyV3oeRqAGWbuy2b1SkgE52ihd-jEGDoD3BO-Ddzd_Kevg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

2016-12-21 0:24 GMT+01:00 Mirosław Doroszewski <miroslaw.doroszewski@gmail.com>:
> Slurs and ties — most difficult to make: developer has to think about
> them before his work.
>
> 1. I have noticed in main web site of LilyPond beautiful image of music.
> 2. The image shows correct breaking of ties between (two) systems.
> 3. But when I was rewriting songs, it happend that breaking ties or
> slurs between (two) systems made ugly print, not like in professional
> music notation books shopped.
> 4. Why the image from main web site of LilyPond has correct shaping
> ties after breaking in two systems and my work accordingly to manuals
> creats ugly shaping of slurs and ties?
> 5. When developer thinks to make project of music notation software,
> he has to decide, what interface will be using by future software. He
> has to be sure that his future software will do with beautiful slurs
> and ties.
> 6. I think that LilyPond is not "music notation for everyone" but only
> for specialists. Per analogiam: there are softwares with graphical
> interface like office packages for any customers; and there are some
> software with none graphical interface like TeX, for specialists
> (there is a LyX, a graphical interface for TeX, Latex, AMSTeX etc.).
> 7. So, please, answer the question in point 4. as above.



Nobody can tell without looking at your code.
Anyway, there is indeed enough room to improve. Patches are welcome.

-Harm

_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]